Defining customer experience...implications and all
| posted on 8/2/10 by Linda Ireland
Recently, over on the Deliver Bliss blog penned by wise man Tim Sanchez, a discussion erupted over the question: What is the definition of customer experience?
I was thrilled to see it. It wasn’t long ago that instead of clarity about what an "experience" is, I would more often hear leaders in pairs and groups talk about tactics or touchpoints or pain points or metrics or best practices or emotions or perceptions…but never the heart of the matter: What IS customer experience? Is it synonomus with customer service or it it bigger than that? Can we define it from the customer's point of view? Often I’ve raised my hand, when I’ve heard one leader say To-MAY-to and another say To-MA-to and I just knew they were not thinking of the same thing.
So when a single post triggered several other leaders to weigh in with enthusiasm, I took it as a terrific sign of how far we've come. Of course I have my take, too.
From the dictionary, the noun experience is defined this way: ex•pe•ri•ence (ĭk-spîr'ē-əns) n. An event or a series of events participated in or lived through.
From this (and years of work as a line exec and with clients at Aveus) I've learned that every experience starts with a person who has a need, desire or problem they would trade something of value (typically money) to have solved. Their experience is what happens and how they feel as they: realize the need, try out options to solve it, buy, use the product or service to solve the need, and evolve to a new need over time.
The implications
Inside the definition, an experience is:
-
Made up of tangible things, such as products and service features, prices, process steps AND cues that trigger emotions, such as color, tone of voice, degree of intimacy.
- Follows a chronology – and while your organization can be many places at once, for each customer, their experience is a one-step-at-a-time affair.
- A single thing - in other words, while inside organizations we separate sales channels and products and business lines and operations areas, customers have only ONE relationship with a brand or company.
Why care about a definition if we’re all focused on customers anyway? Because when everyone in your organization has the same snapshot of the ideal customer experience you’re working on, then every effort can add value. Fuzzy aim will mean some ideas or actions will pay, and some will not. Imagine if world explorers like Dan Buettner, who inspired me by biking from the top to the bottom of Africa, settled for “going south” as a goal? Ever since reading Steven Covey’s 7 Habits of Highly Effective People in grad school I knew what I was: I’m an “end in mind” girl.
You may also find of interest:
There is a flip side, or an organization point of view for this definition, and I discussed it in this post: Customer experience - the view from inside your company
If this conversation triggered some curiosity about how you can act on customer experience to improve financial performance - check out Domino.

About Linda
A blissfully twisted career path and a passion for the link between customer experience and financial performance. Gets excited when actions align to a target experience "front domino." More about Linda.
Customer experience can drive better financial returns. Leaders tell me that they know this intuitively, but need proof of the payoff, as well as a map showing how to translate a target experience into the actions across their organizations that generate those returns. So Domino is the first how-to book on customer experience. Read and find evidence that customer experience can be a path to better profits. See the gaps and opportunities between the customer experience you have and the one you want. Provoke conversations in your team, area or whole organization about the actions that link customer experience to the financial reward you deserve. Learn more.
Essential posts
Defining customer experience…implications and all
Can we measure the patient experience? Not yet.
Are experience-driven organizations more profitable?
Clayton Christensen and your product’s job
Why customer happiness is not enough
Follow @LindaIreland on Twitter
@choypw Thanks for the RT, Daryl. Hope all is well.
7 hours ago
TY! RT @voc_klantreizen: Customer Experience Trends is out! http://t.co/9pbqnF1h Top stories today via @LinziDavis1 @TokenPHD @LindaIreland
7 hours ago
Rich talk w/ guest @9inchmarketing: solving needs or exceeding expectations- which is most important? http://t.co/TNVkkh3h
7 hours ago

3 comments on this post.
with. The 'fuzzy aim' you mention often is the basis for failing
customer experience initiatives. Take care B.
of customer experience as well. He defined customer experience in
terms of three fundamentals: customer expectations, performance and
customer perception. As I commented, I think that perception (the
experience of perceived value) is largely determined by the alignment
of performance and customer expectations. Customer perception, in
turn, defines the customer experience to a large extent. Your points
here fit nicely with this picture: in order to perform well, we will
have to act with the end in mind (thank you Steven Covey). And since
we are in a customer business, we also have to think with the customer
in mind. This will focus our efforts, and it will allow us to align
our performance with the expectations of our customers. I totally
agree with you that customers mainly care about getting their job done
(thank you David Allen). As such, we should measure our performance
primarily in terms of multi-channel task completion rate (and
efficiency, customer satisfaction and loyalty). In my opinion, there
is only one real channel though: the customer channel. And this
channel is just a means to an end: to get the job done.
they have lost control of the customer conversation, and as such, at
least from the customer’s perspective, have forfeited their right to
control the customer experience. Traditional customer relationship
management (CRM) has always been a Push. A manages B. Organizations
manage customers. Sort of reminds me of cowboys trying to manage a
herd of cattle into the cow-pen for slaughter. Organizations have only
been marginally successful at “managing” their customers. Customer
Experience Management (CEM), CRM’s big brother, is at least a
thought in the right direction. However, most firms still do not
“get it.” The ungotten “it” is that customers have taken over
the sandbox and they are not going to give it back. Customers are now
managing vendors, and the vendors have yet to figure that out. Most
firms can print a report titled “My customers” or “Our
customers.” The single most important error with these reports is
the use of the pronouns ‘my’ and ‘our’. Firms no longer own
customers. More accurately, customers now hold the power. Customers
now have “My vendor” reports; vendors they have researched and
hand-culled. If a firm wants to check out how well they are managing
the customer experience all they have to do is to Google themselves,
or search for themselves on YouTube. See what people are saying about
them. Not much of it is favorable, but much of it is viral. Videos,
blogs, Tweets, and chat rooms. Manage that? Too little too late.
Customers are issuing virtual RFPs. Whether they want a large screen
television or a hip replacement, they go to the web. They find out
your pricing, how well you service your customers. They make informed
decisions. Most organizations have a long way to go just to get back
into the battle to make it a fair fight. The first step is for them to
learn how they are being managed by their customers and then to learn
what to do about it.